The two most commonly debated feeder insects go head to head. We compare silkworms and crickets across every meaningful metric to determine which is the better choice for your reptile.
Rankings
| Rank | Feeder | Score | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| undefined | undefined | undefined/undefined | ||
| undefined | undefined | undefined/undefined | ||
| undefined | undefined | undefined/undefined | ||
| undefined | undefined | undefined/undefined | ||
| undefined | undefined | undefined/undefined | ||
| undefined | undefined | undefined/undefined | ||
| undefined | undefined | undefined/undefined | ||
| undefined | undefined | undefined/undefined | ||
| undefined | undefined | undefined/undefined |
Verdict
🎯
Our VerdictSilkworms are nutritionally superior in virtually every category. Crickets win only on cost and availability. If budget allows, silkworms should be the primary feeder with crickets as a convenient backup.
References
- Finke, M.D. (2002). “Complete nutrient composition of commercially raised invertebrates.” Zoo Biology, 21(3), 269–285.
- Oonincx, D.G.A.B. & Dierenfeld, E.S. (2012). “An investigation into the chemical composition of alternative invertebrate prey.” Zoo Biology, 31(1), 40–54.